Big changes could be on the horizon for the UK’s private security industry. With the Security Industry Authority (SIA) now under the Home Office, plus reviews underway on business licensing and the in-house exemption, things are shifting fast. These discussions—largely driven by the Manchester Arena Inquiry recommendations, are all about raising standards, closing loopholes, and improving public safety.
SIA Joins the Home Office: What’s the Impact?
The SIA has now moved under the Minister of State for Security, bringing it closer to the heart of government decision-making. It means better coordination between the security industry, law enforcement, and counter-terrorism efforts.
While the SIA will still operate as an independent regulator, this shift is expected to:
- Improve collaboration with law enforcement and intelligence services.
- Strengthen national security efforts, particularly in protecting public spaces.
- Support Martyn’s Law, which will introduce new security requirements for venues.
The goal is to make security more joined-up and responsive to modern threats, something that’s been needed for a while.
Business Licensing: A Long-Overdue Step?
At the moment, security businesses don’t need a licence to operate, only individual security professionals do. That’s something the Manchester Arena Inquiry flagged as a serious issue, and now a business licensing system is under review.
If introduced, business licensing could:
- Ensure only fit and proper people run security firms, cutting out rogue operators.
- Raise industry standards, with stricter requirements on training and qualifications.
- Improve public safety, by making sure businesses meet a clear regulatory benchmark.
This is something many in the industry have wanted for years. The review is ongoing, but if it gets the green light, it could be a game-changer for professionalism in the sector.
The In-House Exemption: Time for a Rethink?
Another issue under review is the in-house exemption, which lets businesses employ their own security teams without needing SIA licences. While that might seem harmless, it means some security staff don’t meet the same standards as those hired through an external contractor.
Scrapping this exemption would mean:
- All security staff—whether in-house or contracted must meet the same licensing requirements.
- Better training and vetting across the board.
- Closing a loophole that could allow unqualified security to be deployed in public spaces.
It’s a big change to consider, but the argument for consistency in standards is a strong one.
What’s Next?
Right now, these changes are under review, so nothing is set in stone. But it’s clear that the security industry is heading towards tighter regulations, higher accountability, and a bigger focus on public safety.
For businesses and security professionals, now’s the time to stay informed, have a voice in the discussions, and prepare for the changes ahead.
